BOTTOM LINE: analysis of the surprising U.S. war on terrorism, and some great qualities, but almost as a piece of film lives up to its label of "political thriller".
THE GOOD: Probing for the defeat and the parody is on the U.S. war on terrorism, exciting, expressed by the Council missed by key players. Tom Cruise, in particular, provides a yield, expressed as a accomplice of an ambitious Republican Senator Jasper Irving, is Meryl StreepBuy perfect, as the journalist does not hype Irving, and Robert Redford as a teacher trying to motivate one of his students to participate. Even if the issues are in favor of the anti-guerrilla war agenda, suggesting that what happened in the past six years with American foreign policy and how each of us that the company has aa responsibility to do something.
THE BAD: This is a film in the true sense, but it could be mistaken for thinkingIt "was filmed during the game (with the exception of the ancestral line) tackle the history of aviation. Two of the three scenarios are talking about two players sit at a table. Granted, what they contribute speak, but could not a better way to have found to do? The film was a barren spell of 92 minutes, but felt like 3 hours on end. exercise of his pupil, Professor Story is not very good for the first third of the film (to the point where you wonder why isMovie?) Until it seems more connected to the stories of others. And the war zone, although relevant, feels like an attempt at the film about the sit-in talky scenes that do not sit still well, as the film slows down when it comes to talky scenes expand.
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น